Tuesday, 24 September 2013

Blog 1 - What it means to be a leader [RW] (SEPTEMBER 11TH)

So I read about how leaders (usually) have a positive impact on those around them and have a welcoming atmosphere, allowing stress-free environments and what not. While I wholeheartedly agree to this, I just can't help but think of how the Japanese society does not embrace this concept whatsoever. There is a strict hierarchical system which often times causes those 'below' others to NOT be comfortable around many 'sempai' resulting in a system where there is no peace. Of course, there are people who have the qualities of a great leader. However, (for the most part) things don't go so well and people are stuck with others who have no (or not much) respect for each other, and do not work happily. Now, I say 'happily' since (according to the Harvard review) these emotions do transfer to those around you. Thus, a working environment must have at least ONE person who is positive, and slowly their influence will reach others. Though it sounds like an epidemic, it's a good one. I guess you can say that the Japanese phrase "chiri mo tsumoreba yamani to naru" (piled-up specks of dust become a mountain) is actually true. Thus, we can all just become a better person if we want others around us to be like so! Also, as long as someone else is positive, we will probably naturally become more positive. What a wonderful world.
(yes, vice versa is true too, but let's forget about that for now)

So, looking at a bunch of articles about leaders, I've found that most of them were people that were enjoyable to be around. Perhaps they were the center of positivity which allowed everyone else to be positive. The thing is, it must be hard for people to be positive 24/7 so I wonder where/when their negative side comes out. I guess people can't be perfect. Oh well.

2 comments:

  1. Kitashiro-san will talk to us about this. He'll tell us things like "Don't shoot the messenger" because it is important to have subordinates be willing to bring bad news, and how it is not necessary for a leader to get angry. He claims he only gets angry about three times a year, and tries not to get angry at the same person more than once.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I agree with you about the capability of Japanese culture with strict hierarchy to reject sympathetic leaders introduced during class. Leaders may try to be happy ones towards their adherents, but probably in most cases in this country, adherents would not be able to respond with the same frank attitude.

    ReplyDelete